GLG vs OLA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and OLA (Osmanlı Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz- Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLG | OLA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.42% | — | −0.93% |
| Daily | −1.87% | 0.07% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −2.76% | −0.42% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −6.07% | −0.81% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −1.26% | 4.27% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 3.88% | 7.20% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 15.49% | 7.54% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 26.94% | 11.98% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | 125.66% | 100.34% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLG vs OLA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and OLA (Osmanlı Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz- Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GLG leads in 4 and OLA leads in 6. GLG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OLA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: OLA leads (0.07% vs −1.87%). 1 week: OLA leads (−0.42% vs −2.76%). 1 month: OLA leads (−0.81% vs −6.07%). 3 months: OLA leads (4.27% vs −1.26%). 6 months: OLA leads (7.20% vs 3.88%). YTD: GLG leads (15.49% vs 7.54%). 1 year: GLG leads (26.94% vs 11.98%). 3 years: GLG leads (125.66% vs 100.34%). Size (TRY): OLA leads (19.1M vs 17.6M). Investors: GLG leads (246 vs 26).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GLG or OLA?
Year to date GLG returned 15.49% and OLA returned 7.54%; over the last year GLG returned 26.94% and OLA returned 11.98%. Over the last month GLG returned −6.07% and OLA returned −0.81%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GLG or OLA?
As of September 29, 2026, GLG has a size of TRY 17.6M with 246 investors, while OLA has a size of TRY 19.1M with 26 investors. OLA leads in size and GLG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GLG and OLA mean?
The CMB risk score of GLG is 6 out of 7 and that of OLA is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.