Yatırımcı.AI

GLG vs LLA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and LLA (Allbatross Portföy Aydın Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

GLGLLA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GLG vs LLA Fund Comparison
MetricGLGLLACategory median
Today (est.)−2.08%−0.54%−0.81%
Daily−1.87%−2.80%−0.07%
1 week−2.76%−6.13%−0.29%
1 month−6.07%−18.48%0.00%
3 months−1.26%−25.72%4.33%
6 months3.88%−17.17%11.90%
YTD15.49%−20.42%14.97%
1 year26.94%−66.68%21.27%
3 years125.66%−3.42%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 29, 2026, 15:48.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GLG vs LLA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and LLA (Allbatross Portföy Aydın Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 12 metrics compared, GLG leads in 10 and LLA leads in 2. GLG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; LLA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi.

Highlights: Today (est.): LLA leads (−0.54% vs −2.08%). Daily: GLG leads (−1.87% vs −2.80%). 1 week: GLG leads (−2.76% vs −6.13%). 1 month: GLG leads (−6.07% vs −18.48%). 3 months: GLG leads (−1.26% vs −25.72%). 6 months: GLG leads (3.88% vs −17.17%). YTD: GLG leads (15.49% vs −20.42%). 1 year: GLG leads (26.94% vs −66.68%). 3 years: GLG leads (125.66% vs −3.42%). Size (TRY): GLG leads (17.6M vs 17M). Investors: LLA leads (637 vs 246). Risk: GLG leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GLG returned 15.49% and LLA returned −20.42%; over the last year GLG returned 26.94% and LLA returned −66.68%. Over the last month GLG returned −6.07% and LLA returned −18.48%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GLG has a size of TRY 17.6M with 246 investors, while LLA has a size of TRY 17M with 637 investors. GLG leads in size and LLA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GLG is 6 out of 7 and that of LLA is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.