CIN vs LLA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CIN (Aktif Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and LLA (Allbatross Portföy Aydın Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CIN | LLA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −0.54% | −0.81% |
| Daily | −0.96% | −2.80% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −1.82% | −6.13% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | 0.71% | −18.48% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 2.05% | −25.72% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 25.49% | −17.17% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 28.58% | −20.42% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 35.11% | −66.68% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | 7.62% | −3.42% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CIN vs LLA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CIN (Aktif Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and LLA (Allbatross Portföy Aydın Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CIN leads in 9 and LLA leads in 2. CIN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; LLA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi.
Highlights: Daily: CIN leads (−0.96% vs −2.80%). 1 week: CIN leads (−1.82% vs −6.13%). 1 month: CIN leads (0.71% vs −18.48%). 3 months: CIN leads (2.05% vs −25.72%). 6 months: CIN leads (25.49% vs −17.17%). YTD: CIN leads (28.58% vs −20.42%). 1 year: CIN leads (35.11% vs −66.68%). 3 years: CIN leads (7.62% vs −3.42%). Size (TRY): LLA leads (17M vs 16.2M). Investors: LLA leads (637 vs 454). Risk: CIN leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CIN or LLA?
Year to date CIN returned 28.58% and LLA returned −20.42%; over the last year CIN returned 35.11% and LLA returned −66.68%. Over the last month CIN returned 0.71% and LLA returned −18.48%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CIN or LLA?
As of September 29, 2026, CIN has a size of TRY 16.2M with 454 investors, while LLA has a size of TRY 17M with 637 investors. LLA leads in size and LLA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CIN and LLA mean?
The CMB risk score of CIN is 6 out of 7 and that of LLA is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.