Yatırımcı.AI

GBN vs NVT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

GBNNVT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GBN vs NVT Fund Comparison
MetricGBNNVTCategory median
Daily0.09%0.13%0.14%
1 week0.75%0.79%0.70%
1 month3.00%2.88%1.89%
3 months9.43%9.11%3.54%
6 months20.46%19.99%8.73%
YTD36.58%35.20%16.77%
1 year44.54%43.00%20.66%
3 years255.40%252.07%104.51%
Returns are based on prices as of November 5, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GBN vs NVT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 5, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GBN leads in 8 and NVT leads in 3. GBN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NVT leads (0.13% vs 0.09%). 1 week: NVT leads (0.79% vs 0.75%). 1 month: GBN leads (3.00% vs 2.88%). 3 months: GBN leads (9.43% vs 9.11%). 6 months: GBN leads (20.46% vs 19.99%). YTD: GBN leads (36.58% vs 35.20%). 1 year: GBN leads (44.54% vs 43.00%). 3 years: GBN leads (255.40% vs 252.07%). Size (TRY): NVT leads (7.2B vs 6.7B). Investors: GBN leads (381 vs 86). Risk: GBN leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GBN returned 36.58% and NVT returned 35.20%; over the last year GBN returned 44.54% and NVT returned 43.00%. Over the last month GBN returned 3.00% and NVT returned 2.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 5, 2026, GBN has a size of TRY 6.7B with 381 investors, while NVT has a size of TRY 7.2B with 86 investors. NVT leads in size and GBN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GBN is 2 out of 7 and that of NVT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.