DVS vs PKT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DVS | PKT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.08% | 0.10% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 3.06% | 3.05% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 9.59% | 9.65% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 20.80% | 21.12% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 38.08% | 38.79% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 45.29% | 45.84% | 21.23% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DVS vs PKT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DVS leads in 3 and PKT leads in 6. DVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.10% vs 0.08%). 1 week: DVS leads (0.68% vs 0.68%). 1 month: DVS leads (3.06% vs 3.05%). 3 months: PKT leads (9.65% vs 9.59%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.12% vs 20.80%). YTD: PKT leads (38.79% vs 38.08%). 1 year: PKT leads (45.84% vs 45.29%). Size (TRY): DVS leads (7B vs 6.9B). Investors: PKT leads (1,418 vs 363).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DVS or PKT?
Year to date DVS returned 38.08% and PKT returned 38.79%; over the last year DVS returned 45.29% and PKT returned 45.84%. Over the last month DVS returned 3.06% and PKT returned 3.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DVS or PKT?
As of November 13, 2026, DVS has a size of TRY 7B with 363 investors, while PKT has a size of TRY 6.9B with 1,418 investors. DVS leads in size and PKT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DVS and PKT mean?
The CMB risk score of DVS is 2 out of 7 and that of PKT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.