FZP vs PPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FZP | PPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.23% | −3.41% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.43% | −14.49% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 0.89% | −0.26% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 6.08% | 14.38% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 17.03% | −21.88% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 25.87% | −6.50% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 38.19% | 3.85% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 234.79% | 165.57% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FZP vs PPS comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FZP leads in 9 and PPS leads in 2. FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FZP leads (0.23% vs −3.41%). 1 week: FZP leads (0.43% vs −14.49%). 1 month: FZP leads (0.89% vs −0.26%). 3 months: PPS leads (14.38% vs 6.08%). 6 months: FZP leads (17.03% vs −21.88%). YTD: FZP leads (25.87% vs −6.50%). 1 year: FZP leads (38.19% vs 3.85%). 3 years: FZP leads (234.79% vs 165.57%). Size (TRY): FZP leads (795.3M vs 795.1M). Investors: PPS leads (1,648 vs 512). Risk: FZP leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FZP or PPS?
Year to date FZP returned 25.87% and PPS returned −6.50%; over the last year FZP returned 38.19% and PPS returned 3.85%. Over the last month FZP returned 0.89% and PPS returned −0.26%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FZP or PPS?
As of September 28, 2026, FZP has a size of TRY 795.3M with 512 investors, while PPS has a size of TRY 795.1M with 1,648 investors. FZP leads in size and PPS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FZP and PPS mean?
The CMB risk score of FZP is 2 out of 7 and that of PPS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.