PPS vs PTF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and PTF (Qnb Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | PPS | PTF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −3.41% | 0.22% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −14.49% | 0.56% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −0.26% | 2.11% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 14.38% | 8.45% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | −21.88% | 17.14% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −6.50% | 26.67% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 3.85% | 41.10% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 165.57% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the PPS vs PTF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and PTF (Qnb Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PPS leads in 2 and PTF leads in 8. PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Qnb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PTF leads (0.22% vs −3.41%). 1 week: PTF leads (0.56% vs −14.49%). 1 month: PTF leads (2.11% vs −0.26%). 3 months: PPS leads (14.38% vs 8.45%). 6 months: PTF leads (17.14% vs −21.88%). YTD: PTF leads (26.67% vs −6.50%). 1 year: PTF leads (41.10% vs 3.85%). Size (TRY): PTF leads (808.4M vs 795.1M). Investors: PPS leads (1,648 vs 260). Risk: PTF leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, PPS or PTF?
Year to date PPS returned −6.50% and PTF returned 26.67%; over the last year PPS returned 3.85% and PTF returned 41.10%. Over the last month PPS returned −0.26% and PTF returned 2.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PPS or PTF?
As of September 28, 2026, PPS has a size of TRY 795.1M with 1,648 investors, while PTF has a size of TRY 808.4M with 260 investors. PTF leads in size and PPS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PPS and PTF mean?
The CMB risk score of PPS is 7 out of 7 and that of PTF is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.