EBI vs FZP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EBI (Emaa Blue Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EBI | FZP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.12% | 0.23% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.51% | 0.43% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −1.42% | 0.89% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 4.46% | 6.08% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 10.75% | 17.03% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 11.16% | 25.87% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | 38.19% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 234.79% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EBI vs FZP comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EBI (Emaa Blue Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EBI leads in 2 and FZP leads in 7. EBI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FZP leads (0.23% vs 0.12%). 1 week: FZP leads (0.43% vs −0.51%). 1 month: FZP leads (0.89% vs −1.42%). 3 months: FZP leads (6.08% vs 4.46%). 6 months: FZP leads (17.03% vs 10.75%). YTD: FZP leads (25.87% vs 11.16%). Size (TRY): EBI leads (809.2M vs 795.3M). Investors: FZP leads (512 vs 14). Risk: EBI leads (0 vs 2).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EBI or FZP?
Year to date EBI returned 11.16% and FZP returned 25.87%; over the last year EBI returned — and FZP returned 38.19%. Over the last month EBI returned −1.42% and FZP returned 0.89%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EBI or FZP?
As of September 28, 2026, EBI has a size of TRY 809.2M with 14 investors, while FZP has a size of TRY 795.3M with 512 investors. EBI leads in size and FZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EBI and FZP mean?
The CMB risk score of EBI is 0 out of 7 and that of FZP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.