Yatırımcı.AI

FZJ vs NBO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FZJ (Fiba Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FZJNBO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FZJ vs NBO Fund Comparison
MetricFZJNBOCategory median
Daily−0.98%0.08%−1.16%
1 week−1.63%0.67%−1.71%
1 month−2.30%2.92%−3.74%
3 months2.83%9.82%−0.11%
6 months8.49%21.55%2.89%
YTD21.00%39.18%18.90%
1 year28.73%49.97%28.73%
3 years173.23%—162.51%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FZJ vs NBO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FZJ (Fiba Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FZJ leads in 1 and NBO leads in 9. FZJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NBO is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NBO leads (0.08% vs −0.98%). 1 week: NBO leads (0.67% vs −1.63%). 1 month: NBO leads (2.92% vs −2.30%). 3 months: NBO leads (9.82% vs 2.83%). 6 months: NBO leads (21.55% vs 8.49%). YTD: NBO leads (39.18% vs 21.00%). 1 year: NBO leads (49.97% vs 28.73%). Size (TRY): NBO leads (1.4B vs 1B). Investors: FZJ leads (1,948 vs 283). Risk: NBO leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FZJ returned 21.00% and NBO returned 39.18%; over the last year FZJ returned 28.73% and NBO returned 49.97%. Over the last month FZJ returned −2.30% and NBO returned 2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FZJ has a size of TRY 1B with 1,948 investors, while NBO has a size of TRY 1.4B with 283 investors. NBO leads in size and FZJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FZJ is 4 out of 7 and that of NBO is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.