Yatırımcı.AI

FZJ vs ILZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FZJ (Fiba Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ILZ (İş Portföy Temkinli Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FZJILZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FZJ vs ILZ Fund Comparison
MetricFZJILZCategory median
Daily0.01%−0.25%−0.12%
1 week0.64%0.92%0.58%
1 month−0.55%1.93%−1.65%
3 months2.41%7.77%−1.67%
6 months7.98%16.30%1.08%
YTD22.77%22.27%20.42%
1 year30.07%34.86%26.40%
3 years170.73%218.97%160.09%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FZJ vs ILZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FZJ (Fiba Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ILZ (İş Portföy Temkinli Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FZJ leads in 2 and ILZ leads in 9. FZJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ILZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FZJ leads (0.01% vs −0.25%). 1 week: ILZ leads (0.92% vs 0.64%). 1 month: ILZ leads (1.93% vs −0.55%). 3 months: ILZ leads (7.77% vs 2.41%). 6 months: ILZ leads (16.30% vs 7.98%). YTD: FZJ leads (22.77% vs 22.27%). 1 year: ILZ leads (34.86% vs 30.07%). 3 years: ILZ leads (218.97% vs 170.73%). Size (TRY): ILZ leads (1B vs 986.7M). Investors: ILZ leads (5,834 vs 1,896). Risk: ILZ leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FZJ returned 22.77% and ILZ returned 22.27%; over the last year FZJ returned 30.07% and ILZ returned 34.86%. Over the last month FZJ returned −0.55% and ILZ returned 1.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, FZJ has a size of TRY 986.7M with 1,896 investors, while ILZ has a size of TRY 1B with 5,834 investors. ILZ leads in size and ILZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FZJ is 4 out of 7 and that of ILZ is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.