Yatırımcı.AI

NBO vs ODV Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ODV (Ak Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

NBOODV
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NBO vs ODV Fund Comparison
MetricNBOODVCategory median
Daily0.08%0.36%−1.16%
1 week0.67%1.08%−1.71%
1 month2.92%1.63%−3.74%
3 months9.82%3.73%−0.11%
6 months21.55%1.34%2.89%
YTD39.18%16.14%18.90%
1 year49.97%24.67%28.73%
3 years—158.40%162.51%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NBO vs ODV Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ODV (Ak Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NBO leads in 6 and ODV leads in 4. NBO is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ODV is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ODV leads (0.36% vs 0.08%). 1 week: ODV leads (1.08% vs 0.67%). 1 month: NBO leads (2.92% vs 1.63%). 3 months: NBO leads (9.82% vs 3.73%). 6 months: NBO leads (21.55% vs 1.34%). YTD: NBO leads (39.18% vs 16.14%). 1 year: NBO leads (49.97% vs 24.67%). Size (TRY): ODV leads (1.5B vs 1.4B). Investors: ODV leads (3,521 vs 283). Risk: NBO leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NBO returned 39.18% and ODV returned 16.14%; over the last year NBO returned 49.97% and ODV returned 24.67%. Over the last month NBO returned 2.92% and ODV returned 1.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, NBO has a size of TRY 1.4B with 283 investors, while ODV has a size of TRY 1.5B with 3,521 investors. ODV leads in size and ODV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NBO is 2 out of 7 and that of ODV is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.