Yatırımcı.AI

GZJ vs NBO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZJ (Garanti Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GZJNBO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZJ vs NBO Fund Comparison
MetricGZJNBOCategory median
Daily−1.26%0.08%−1.16%
1 week−2.39%0.67%−1.71%
1 month−3.66%2.92%−3.74%
3 months−0.58%9.82%−0.11%
6 months2.66%21.55%2.89%
YTD16.28%39.18%18.90%
1 year24.86%49.97%28.73%
3 years180.18%—162.51%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZJ vs NBO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZJ (Garanti Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GZJ leads in 2 and NBO leads in 8. GZJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NBO is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NBO leads (0.08% vs −1.26%). 1 week: NBO leads (0.67% vs −2.39%). 1 month: NBO leads (2.92% vs −3.66%). 3 months: NBO leads (9.82% vs −0.58%). 6 months: NBO leads (21.55% vs 2.66%). YTD: NBO leads (39.18% vs 16.28%). 1 year: NBO leads (49.97% vs 24.86%). Size (TRY): GZJ leads (1.6B vs 1.4B). Investors: GZJ leads (4,670 vs 283). Risk: NBO leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZJ returned 16.28% and NBO returned 39.18%; over the last year GZJ returned 24.86% and NBO returned 49.97%. Over the last month GZJ returned −3.66% and NBO returned 2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GZJ has a size of TRY 1.6B with 4,670 investors, while NBO has a size of TRY 1.4B with 283 investors. GZJ leads in size and GZJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZJ is 4 out of 7 and that of NBO is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.