FTL vs NAK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and NAK (Neo Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FTL | NAK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.09% | −0.56% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | 0.63% | 0.34% | 0.62% |
| 1 month | 2.93% | −1.45% | −0.73% |
| 3 months | 9.40% | −2.18% | 0.80% |
| 6 months | 20.61% | −4.21% | 5.53% |
| YTD | 37.78% | 2.66% | 29.43% |
| 1 year | 44.78% | — | 35.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FTL vs NAK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and NAK (Neo Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FTL leads in 9 and NAK leads in 0. FTL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NAK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FTL leads (0.09% vs −0.56%). 1 week: FTL leads (0.63% vs 0.34%). 1 month: FTL leads (2.93% vs −1.45%). 3 months: FTL leads (9.40% vs −2.18%). 6 months: FTL leads (20.61% vs −4.21%). YTD: FTL leads (37.78% vs 2.66%). Size (TRY): FTL leads (116.9M vs 114.6M). Investors: FTL leads (563 vs 125). Risk: FTL leads (1 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FTL or NAK?
Year to date FTL returned 37.78% and NAK returned 2.66%; over the last year FTL returned 44.78% and NAK returned —. Over the last month FTL returned 2.93% and NAK returned −1.45%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FTL or NAK?
As of November 12, 2026, FTL has a size of TRY 116.9M with 563 investors, while NAK has a size of TRY 114.6M with 125 investors. FTL leads in size and FTL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FTL and NAK mean?
The CMB risk score of FTL is 1 out of 7 and that of NAK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.