Yatırımcı.AI

FSR vs ZPA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FSRZPA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FSR vs ZPA Fund Comparison
MetricFSRZPACategory median
Daily0.05%0.07%0.01%
1 week0.59%0.51%0.30%
1 month−0.22%2.05%0.00%
3 months4.12%6.35%3.96%
6 months6.79%12.52%8.18%
YTD12.27%18.87%15.73%
1 year16.93%23.36%20.69%
3 years17.30%114.16%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FSR vs ZPA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FSR leads in 3 and ZPA leads in 7. FSR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZPA leads (0.07% vs 0.05%). 1 week: FSR leads (0.59% vs 0.51%). 1 month: ZPA leads (2.05% vs −0.22%). 3 months: ZPA leads (6.35% vs 4.12%). 6 months: ZPA leads (12.52% vs 6.79%). YTD: ZPA leads (18.87% vs 12.27%). 1 year: ZPA leads (23.36% vs 16.93%). 3 years: ZPA leads (114.16% vs 17.30%). Size (TRY): FSR leads (5.4B vs 5.2B). Investors: FSR leads (2,323 vs 998).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FSR returned 12.27% and ZPA returned 18.87%; over the last year FSR returned 16.93% and ZPA returned 23.36%. Over the last month FSR returned −0.22% and ZPA returned 2.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FSR has a size of TRY 5.4B with 2,323 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 5.2B with 998 investors. FSR leads in size and FSR leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSR is — out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.