Yatırımcı.AI

DVS vs ZPA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

DVSZPA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DVS vs ZPA Fund Comparison
MetricDVSZPACategory median
Daily0.10%0.06%0.05%
1 week0.70%0.51%0.44%
1 month3.00%2.03%0.38%
3 months9.89%6.33%3.95%
6 months20.75%12.44%8.45%
YTD35.16%18.79%16.06%
1 year45.63%23.35%20.98%
3 years—114.02%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DVS vs ZPA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPA (Ziraat Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DVS leads in 8 and ZPA leads in 2. DVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DVS leads (0.10% vs 0.06%). 1 week: DVS leads (0.70% vs 0.51%). 1 month: DVS leads (3.00% vs 2.03%). 3 months: DVS leads (9.89% vs 6.33%). 6 months: DVS leads (20.75% vs 12.44%). YTD: DVS leads (35.16% vs 18.79%). 1 year: DVS leads (45.63% vs 23.35%). Size (TRY): ZPA leads (5.1B vs 5.1B). Investors: ZPA leads (999 vs 358). Risk: DVS leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DVS returned 35.16% and ZPA returned 18.79%; over the last year DVS returned 45.63% and ZPA returned 23.35%. Over the last month DVS returned 3.00% and ZPA returned 2.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, DVS has a size of TRY 5.1B with 358 investors, while ZPA has a size of TRY 5.1B with 999 investors. ZPA leads in size and ZPA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DVS is 2 out of 7 and that of ZPA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.