PKP vs TCC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and TCC (Tacirler Portföy Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PKP | TCC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | 0.68% | 0.18% | 0.53% |
| 1 month | 3.02% | −1.08% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 10.11% | 6.64% | 3.74% |
| 6 months | 21.26% | 15.22% | 9.91% |
| YTD | 31.99% | 18.46% | 15.04% |
| 1 year | — | 23.56% | 20.96% |
| 3 years | — | 123.08% | 107.79% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PKP vs TCC Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and TCC (Tacirler Portföy Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 9, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PKP leads in 7 and TCC leads in 2. PKP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TCC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Tacirler Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PKP leads (0.09% vs 0.08%). 1 week: PKP leads (0.68% vs 0.18%). 1 month: PKP leads (3.02% vs −1.08%). 3 months: PKP leads (10.11% vs 6.64%). 6 months: PKP leads (21.26% vs 15.22%). YTD: PKP leads (31.99% vs 18.46%). Size (TRY): TCC leads (354.8M vs 351.7M). Investors: TCC leads (318 vs 66). Risk: PKP leads (1 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PKP or TCC?
Year to date PKP returned 31.99% and TCC returned 18.46%; over the last year PKP returned — and TCC returned 23.56%. Over the last month PKP returned 3.02% and TCC returned −1.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PKP or TCC?
As of October 9, 2026, PKP has a size of TRY 351.7M with 66 investors, while TCC has a size of TRY 354.8M with 318 investors. TCC leads in size and TCC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PKP and TCC mean?
The CMB risk score of PKP is 1 out of 7 and that of TCC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.