Yatırımcı.AI

AUV vs FSH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) side by side.

AUVFSH
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AUV vs FSH Fund Comparison
MetricAUVFSHCategory median
Daily−0.37%0.82%0.19%
1 week−0.24%2.38%0.42%
1 month−1.41%2.50%0.94%
3 months1.43%6.99%5.89%
6 months11.88%42.14%12.86%
YTD10.45%39.09%18.07%
1 year18.53%48.45%24.44%
3 years12.92%271.33%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AUV vs FSH comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AUV leads in 3 and FSH leads in 8. AUV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FSH leads (0.82% vs −0.37%). 1 week: FSH leads (2.38% vs −0.24%). 1 month: FSH leads (2.50% vs −1.41%). 3 months: FSH leads (6.99% vs 1.43%). 6 months: FSH leads (42.14% vs 11.88%). YTD: FSH leads (39.09% vs 10.45%). 1 year: FSH leads (48.45% vs 18.53%). 3 years: FSH leads (271.33% vs 12.92%). Size (TRY): AUV leads (377.5M vs 372M). Investors: AUV leads (486 vs 478). Risk: AUV leads (0 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AUV returned 10.45% and FSH returned 39.09%; over the last year AUV returned 18.53% and FSH returned 48.45%. Over the last month AUV returned −1.41% and FSH returned 2.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AUV has a size of TRY 377.5M with 486 investors, while FSH has a size of TRY 372M with 478 investors. AUV leads in size and AUV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AUV is 0 out of 7 and that of FSH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.