FPG vs PPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FPG | PPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.31% | −3.41% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −3.67% | −14.49% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.42% | −0.26% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 14.74% | 14.38% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 0.02% | −21.88% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −2.96% | −6.50% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 54.49% | 3.85% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 165.57% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FPG vs PPS comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FPG leads in 8 and PPS leads in 2. FPG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FPG leads (0.31% vs −3.41%). 1 week: FPG leads (−3.67% vs −14.49%). 1 month: PPS leads (−0.26% vs −5.42%). 3 months: FPG leads (14.74% vs 14.38%). 6 months: FPG leads (0.02% vs −21.88%). YTD: FPG leads (−2.96% vs −6.50%). 1 year: FPG leads (54.49% vs 3.85%). Size (TRY): PPS leads (795.1M vs 779.1M). Investors: FPG leads (1,905 vs 1,648). Risk: FPG leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FPG or PPS?
Year to date FPG returned −2.96% and PPS returned −6.50%; over the last year FPG returned 54.49% and PPS returned 3.85%. Over the last month FPG returned −5.42% and PPS returned −0.26%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FPG or PPS?
As of September 28, 2026, FPG has a size of TRY 779.1M with 1,905 investors, while PPS has a size of TRY 795.1M with 1,648 investors. PPS leads in size and FPG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FPG and PPS mean?
The CMB risk score of FPG is 6 out of 7 and that of PPS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.