FPG vs RPN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FPG | RPN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.56% | −1.97% |
| Daily | 0.31% | 0.78% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −3.67% | −1.14% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.42% | −4.44% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 14.74% | −8.68% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 0.02% | 0.95% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −2.96% | 9.07% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 54.49% | 16.68% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 33.61% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FPG vs RPN comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FPG leads in 3 and RPN leads in 6. FPG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RPN leads (0.78% vs 0.31%). 1 week: RPN leads (−1.14% vs −3.67%). 1 month: RPN leads (−4.44% vs −5.42%). 3 months: FPG leads (14.74% vs −8.68%). 6 months: RPN leads (0.95% vs 0.02%). YTD: RPN leads (9.07% vs −2.96%). 1 year: FPG leads (54.49% vs 16.68%). Size (TRY): RPN leads (779.6M vs 779.1M). Investors: FPG leads (1,905 vs 23).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FPG or RPN?
Year to date FPG returned −2.96% and RPN returned 9.07%; over the last year FPG returned 54.49% and RPN returned 16.68%. Over the last month FPG returned −5.42% and RPN returned −4.44%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FPG or RPN?
As of September 28, 2026, FPG has a size of TRY 779.1M with 1,905 investors, while RPN has a size of TRY 779.6M with 23 investors. RPN leads in size and FPG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FPG and RPN mean?
The CMB risk score of FPG is 6 out of 7 and that of RPN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.