BJD vs FPG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BJD | FPG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.04% | 0.31% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.37% | −3.67% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 1.74% | −5.42% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 5.73% | 14.74% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 11.62% | 0.02% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 16.06% | −2.96% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 21.06% | 54.49% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 92.44% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BJD vs FPG comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BJD leads in 5 and FPG leads in 5. BJD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FPG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FPG leads (0.31% vs 0.04%). 1 week: BJD leads (0.37% vs −3.67%). 1 month: BJD leads (1.74% vs −5.42%). 3 months: FPG leads (14.74% vs 5.73%). 6 months: BJD leads (11.62% vs 0.02%). YTD: BJD leads (16.06% vs −2.96%). 1 year: FPG leads (54.49% vs 21.06%). Size (TRY): FPG leads (779.1M vs 773.1M). Investors: FPG leads (1,905 vs 99). Risk: BJD leads (0 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, BJD or FPG?
Year to date BJD returned 16.06% and FPG returned −2.96%; over the last year BJD returned 21.06% and FPG returned 54.49%. Over the last month BJD returned 1.74% and FPG returned −5.42%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BJD or FPG?
As of September 28, 2026, BJD has a size of TRY 773.1M with 99 investors, while FPG has a size of TRY 779.1M with 1,905 investors. FPG leads in size and FPG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BJD and FPG mean?
The CMB risk score of BJD is 0 out of 7 and that of FPG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.