FPG vs PPE Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PPE (Phillip Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FPG | PPE | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.19% | −0.02% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −0.35% | 0.08% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −13.56% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −2.22% | 4.68% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | −21.92% | 9.82% | 8.18% |
| YTD | −15.74% | 14.88% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 28.32% | 20.67% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | — | 51.19% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FPG vs PPE Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PPE (Phillip Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FPG leads in 3 and PPE leads in 6. FPG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPE is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PPE leads (−0.02% vs −2.19%). 1 week: PPE leads (0.08% vs −0.35%). 1 month: PPE leads (0.83% vs −13.56%). 3 months: PPE leads (4.68% vs −2.22%). 6 months: PPE leads (9.82% vs −21.92%). YTD: PPE leads (14.88% vs −15.74%). 1 year: FPG leads (28.32% vs 20.67%). Size (TRY): FPG leads (682.6M vs 681.1M). Investors: FPG leads (1,800 vs 40).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FPG or PPE?
Year to date FPG returned −15.74% and PPE returned 14.88%; over the last year FPG returned 28.32% and PPE returned 20.67%. Over the last month FPG returned −13.56% and PPE returned 0.83%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FPG or PPE?
As of October 23, 2026, FPG has a size of TRY 682.6M with 1,800 investors, while PPE has a size of TRY 681.1M with 40 investors. FPG leads in size and FPG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FPG and PPE mean?
The CMB risk score of FPG is 7 out of 7 and that of PPE is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.