PPE vs RRA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PPE (Phillip Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PPE | RRA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.51% | 0.10% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.73% | 0.71% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 1.22% | 3.17% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 4.53% | 9.56% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 9.84% | 21.28% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 14.90% | 36.98% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 20.79% | 48.04% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 51.19% | — | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PPE vs RRA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PPE (Phillip Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PPE leads in 2 and RRA leads in 7. PPE is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RRA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PPE leads (0.51% vs 0.10%). 1 week: PPE leads (0.73% vs 0.71%). 1 month: RRA leads (3.17% vs 1.22%). 3 months: RRA leads (9.56% vs 4.53%). 6 months: RRA leads (21.28% vs 9.84%). YTD: RRA leads (36.98% vs 14.90%). 1 year: RRA leads (48.04% vs 20.79%). Size (TRY): RRA leads (683M vs 681.2M). Investors: RRA leads (144 vs 40).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PPE or RRA?
Year to date PPE returned 14.90% and RRA returned 36.98%; over the last year PPE returned 20.79% and RRA returned 48.04%. Over the last month PPE returned 1.22% and RRA returned 3.17%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PPE or RRA?
As of October 22, 2026, PPE has a size of TRY 681.2M with 40 investors, while RRA has a size of TRY 683M with 144 investors. RRA leads in size and RRA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PPE and RRA mean?
The CMB risk score of PPE is — out of 7 and that of RRA is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.