FPG vs RRA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FPG | RRA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.05% | 0.10% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | −1.32% | 0.71% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −12.04% | 3.17% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 1.73% | 9.56% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | −20.17% | 21.28% | 8.45% |
| YTD | −13.85% | 36.98% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 30.76% | 48.04% | 20.98% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FPG vs RRA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FPG leads in 2 and RRA leads in 8. FPG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RRA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RRA leads (0.10% vs −0.05%). 1 week: RRA leads (0.71% vs −1.32%). 1 month: RRA leads (3.17% vs −12.04%). 3 months: RRA leads (9.56% vs 1.73%). 6 months: RRA leads (21.28% vs −20.17%). YTD: RRA leads (36.98% vs −13.85%). 1 year: RRA leads (48.04% vs 30.76%). Size (TRY): FPG leads (698.1M vs 683M). Investors: FPG leads (1,803 vs 144). Risk: RRA leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FPG or RRA?
Year to date FPG returned −13.85% and RRA returned 36.98%; over the last year FPG returned 30.76% and RRA returned 48.04%. Over the last month FPG returned −12.04% and RRA returned 3.17%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FPG or RRA?
As of October 22, 2026, FPG has a size of TRY 698.1M with 1,803 investors, while RRA has a size of TRY 683M with 144 investors. FPG leads in size and FPG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FPG and RRA mean?
The CMB risk score of FPG is 7 out of 7 and that of RRA is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.