Yatırımcı.AI

GAG vs PPE Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GAG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PPE (Phillip Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GAGPPE
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GAG vs PPE Fund Comparison
MetricGAGPPECategory median
Daily0.07%0.51%0.05%
1 week0.53%0.73%0.44%
1 month2.01%1.22%0.38%
3 months6.19%4.53%3.95%
6 months12.83%9.84%8.45%
YTD19.51%14.90%16.06%
1 year23.43%20.79%20.98%
3 years102.65%51.19%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GAG vs PPE Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GAG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PPE (Phillip Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GAG leads in 8 and PPE leads in 2. GAG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPE is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPE leads (0.51% vs 0.07%). 1 week: PPE leads (0.73% vs 0.53%). 1 month: GAG leads (2.01% vs 1.22%). 3 months: GAG leads (6.19% vs 4.53%). 6 months: GAG leads (12.83% vs 9.84%). YTD: GAG leads (19.51% vs 14.90%). 1 year: GAG leads (23.43% vs 20.79%). 3 years: GAG leads (102.65% vs 51.19%). Size (TRY): GAG leads (697.4M vs 681.2M). Investors: GAG leads (184 vs 40).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GAG returned 19.51% and PPE returned 14.90%; over the last year GAG returned 23.43% and PPE returned 20.79%. Over the last month GAG returned 2.01% and PPE returned 1.22%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GAG has a size of TRY 697.4M with 184 investors, while PPE has a size of TRY 681.2M with 40 investors. GAG leads in size and GAG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GAG is 5 out of 7 and that of PPE is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.