Yatırımcı.AI

NCS vs VNK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NCS (Nurol Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and VNK (Vega Portföy Anka Serbest Fon) side by side.

NCSVNK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NCS vs VNK Fund Comparison
MetricNCSVNKCategory median
Daily0.07%0.22%0.05%
1 week0.55%0.59%0.44%
1 month2.22%3.27%0.38%
3 months6.58%8.14%3.95%
6 months13.34%8.65%8.45%
YTD20.27%22.73%16.06%
1 year24.24%34.54%20.98%
3 years114.01%46.54%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NCS vs VNK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NCS (Nurol Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and VNK (Vega Portföy Anka Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NCS leads in 3 and VNK leads in 7. NCS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VNK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Vega Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: VNK leads (0.22% vs 0.07%). 1 week: VNK leads (0.59% vs 0.55%). 1 month: VNK leads (3.27% vs 2.22%). 3 months: VNK leads (8.14% vs 6.58%). 6 months: NCS leads (13.34% vs 8.65%). YTD: VNK leads (22.73% vs 20.27%). 1 year: VNK leads (34.54% vs 24.24%). 3 years: NCS leads (114.01% vs 46.54%). Size (TRY): VNK leads (3.7B vs 3.5B). Investors: NCS leads (1,053 vs 164).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NCS returned 20.27% and VNK returned 22.73%; over the last year NCS returned 24.24% and VNK returned 34.54%. Over the last month NCS returned 2.22% and VNK returned 3.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, NCS has a size of TRY 3.5B with 1,053 investors, while VNK has a size of TRY 3.7B with 164 investors. VNK leads in size and NCS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NCS is — out of 7 and that of VNK is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.