Yatırımcı.AI

GPZ vs PPZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPZ (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası Fonu) and PPZ (Azimut Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

GPZPPZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GPZ vs PPZ Fund Comparison
MetricGPZPPZCategory median
Daily0.29%0.12%0.29%
1 week0.70%0.52%0.70%
1 month3.13%2.92%3.12%
3 months10.15%9.74%9.98%
6 months21.60%21.40%21.60%
YTD32.32%31.96%32.28%
1 year46.50%45.91%46.56%
3 years30.05%260.77%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GPZ vs PPZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPZ (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası Fonu) and PPZ (Azimut Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GPZ leads in 8 and PPZ leads in 3. GPZ is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPZ is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPZ leads (0.29% vs 0.12%). 1 week: GPZ leads (0.70% vs 0.52%). 1 month: GPZ leads (3.13% vs 2.92%). 3 months: GPZ leads (10.15% vs 9.74%). 6 months: GPZ leads (21.60% vs 21.40%). YTD: GPZ leads (32.32% vs 31.96%). 1 year: GPZ leads (46.50% vs 45.91%). 3 years: PPZ leads (260.77% vs 30.05%). Size (TRY): PPZ leads (10.3B vs 7.5B). Investors: PPZ leads (7,555 vs 289). Risk: GPZ leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GPZ returned 32.32% and PPZ returned 31.96%; over the last year GPZ returned 46.50% and PPZ returned 45.91%. Over the last month GPZ returned 3.13% and PPZ returned 2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GPZ has a size of TRY 7.5B with 289 investors, while PPZ has a size of TRY 10.3B with 7,555 investors. PPZ leads in size and PPZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPZ is 1 out of 7 and that of PPZ is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.