Yatırımcı.AI

FIL vs GPZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and GPZ (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası Fonu) side by side.

FILGPZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FIL vs GPZ Fund Comparison
MetricFILGPZCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.29%
1 week0.69%0.70%0.70%
1 month3.08%3.13%3.12%
3 months9.88%10.15%9.98%
6 months21.44%21.60%21.60%
YTD32.08%32.32%32.28%
1 year46.18%46.50%46.56%
3 years258.62%30.05%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FIL vs GPZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and GPZ (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FIL leads in 3 and GPZ leads in 7. FIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GPZ is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPZ leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: GPZ leads (0.70% vs 0.69%). 1 month: GPZ leads (3.13% vs 3.08%). 3 months: GPZ leads (10.15% vs 9.88%). 6 months: GPZ leads (21.60% vs 21.44%). YTD: GPZ leads (32.32% vs 32.08%). 1 year: GPZ leads (46.50% vs 46.18%). 3 years: FIL leads (258.62% vs 30.05%). Size (TRY): FIL leads (15.3B vs 7.5B). Investors: FIL leads (20,525 vs 289).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FIL returned 32.08% and GPZ returned 32.32%; over the last year FIL returned 46.18% and GPZ returned 46.50%. Over the last month FIL returned 3.08% and GPZ returned 3.13%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FIL has a size of TRY 15.3B with 20,525 investors, while GPZ has a size of TRY 7.5B with 289 investors. FIL leads in size and FIL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIL is 1 out of 7 and that of GPZ is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.