Yatırımcı.AI

PPN vs PPZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PPN (Nurol Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPZ (Azimut Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

PPNPPZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

PPN vs PPZ Fund Comparison
MetricPPNPPZCategory median
Daily0.30%0.12%0.29%
1 week0.72%0.52%0.70%
1 month3.19%2.92%3.12%
3 months10.21%9.74%9.98%
6 months22.27%21.40%21.60%
YTD33.14%31.96%32.28%
1 year47.68%45.91%46.56%
3 years270.91%260.77%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the PPN vs PPZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PPN (Nurol Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPZ (Azimut Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, PPN leads in 10 and PPZ leads in 1. PPN is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPZ is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPN leads (0.30% vs 0.12%). 1 week: PPN leads (0.72% vs 0.52%). 1 month: PPN leads (3.19% vs 2.92%). 3 months: PPN leads (10.21% vs 9.74%). 6 months: PPN leads (22.27% vs 21.40%). YTD: PPN leads (33.14% vs 31.96%). 1 year: PPN leads (47.68% vs 45.91%). 3 years: PPN leads (270.91% vs 260.77%). Size (TRY): PPZ leads (10.3B vs 9.7B). Investors: PPN leads (10,751 vs 7,555). Risk: PPN leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date PPN returned 33.14% and PPZ returned 31.96%; over the last year PPN returned 47.68% and PPZ returned 45.91%. Over the last month PPN returned 3.19% and PPZ returned 2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, PPN has a size of TRY 9.7B with 10,751 investors, while PPZ has a size of TRY 10.3B with 7,555 investors. PPZ leads in size and PPN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PPN is 1 out of 7 and that of PPZ is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.