Yatırımcı.AI

DL2 vs PPN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DL2 (Deniz Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPN (Nurol Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

DL2PPN
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DL2 vs PPN Fund Comparison
MetricDL2PPNCategory median
Daily0.29%0.30%0.29%
1 week0.71%0.72%0.70%
1 month3.02%3.19%3.12%
3 months9.91%10.21%9.98%
6 months21.35%22.27%21.60%
YTD31.97%33.14%32.28%
1 year46.28%47.68%46.56%
3 years32.55%270.91%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DL2 vs PPN comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DL2 (Deniz Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPN (Nurol Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DL2 leads in 0 and PPN leads in 10. DL2 is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; PPN is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPN leads (0.30% vs 0.29%). 1 week: PPN leads (0.72% vs 0.71%). 1 month: PPN leads (3.19% vs 3.02%). 3 months: PPN leads (10.21% vs 9.91%). 6 months: PPN leads (22.27% vs 21.35%). YTD: PPN leads (33.14% vs 31.97%). 1 year: PPN leads (47.68% vs 46.28%). 3 years: PPN leads (270.91% vs 32.55%). Size (TRY): PPN leads (9.7B vs 6.7B). Investors: PPN leads (10,751 vs 615).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DL2 returned 31.97% and PPN returned 33.14%; over the last year DL2 returned 46.28% and PPN returned 47.68%. Over the last month DL2 returned 3.02% and PPN returned 3.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DL2 has a size of TRY 6.7B with 615 investors, while PPN has a size of TRY 9.7B with 10,751 investors. PPN leads in size and PPN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DL2 is 1 out of 7 and that of PPN is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.