Yatırımcı.AI

DL2 vs GPZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DL2 (Deniz Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and GPZ (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası Fonu) side by side.

DL2GPZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DL2 vs GPZ Fund Comparison
MetricDL2GPZCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.29%
1 week0.71%0.70%0.70%
1 month3.02%3.13%3.12%
3 months9.91%10.15%9.98%
6 months21.35%21.60%21.60%
YTD31.97%32.32%32.28%
1 year46.28%46.50%46.56%
3 years32.55%30.05%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DL2 vs GPZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DL2 (Deniz Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and GPZ (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DL2 leads in 4 and GPZ leads in 6. DL2 is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; GPZ is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DL2 leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: DL2 leads (0.71% vs 0.70%). 1 month: GPZ leads (3.13% vs 3.02%). 3 months: GPZ leads (10.15% vs 9.91%). 6 months: GPZ leads (21.60% vs 21.35%). YTD: GPZ leads (32.32% vs 31.97%). 1 year: GPZ leads (46.50% vs 46.28%). 3 years: DL2 leads (32.55% vs 30.05%). Size (TRY): GPZ leads (7.5B vs 6.7B). Investors: DL2 leads (615 vs 289).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DL2 returned 31.97% and GPZ returned 32.32%; over the last year DL2 returned 46.28% and GPZ returned 46.50%. Over the last month DL2 returned 3.02% and GPZ returned 3.13%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DL2 has a size of TRY 6.7B with 615 investors, while GPZ has a size of TRY 7.5B with 289 investors. GPZ leads in size and DL2 leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DL2 is 1 out of 7 and that of GPZ is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.