Yatırımcı.AI

GPZ vs PPN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPZ (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası Fonu) and PPN (Nurol Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

GPZPPN
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GPZ vs PPN Fund Comparison
MetricGPZPPNCategory median
Daily0.29%0.30%0.29%
1 week0.70%0.72%0.70%
1 month3.13%3.19%3.12%
3 months10.15%10.21%9.98%
6 months21.60%22.27%21.60%
YTD32.32%33.14%32.28%
1 year46.50%47.68%46.56%
3 years30.05%270.91%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GPZ vs PPN comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPZ (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası Fonu) and PPN (Nurol Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GPZ leads in 0 and PPN leads in 10. GPZ is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPN is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPN leads (0.30% vs 0.29%). 1 week: PPN leads (0.72% vs 0.70%). 1 month: PPN leads (3.19% vs 3.13%). 3 months: PPN leads (10.21% vs 10.15%). 6 months: PPN leads (22.27% vs 21.60%). YTD: PPN leads (33.14% vs 32.32%). 1 year: PPN leads (47.68% vs 46.50%). 3 years: PPN leads (270.91% vs 30.05%). Size (TRY): PPN leads (9.7B vs 7.5B). Investors: PPN leads (10,751 vs 289).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GPZ returned 32.32% and PPN returned 33.14%; over the last year GPZ returned 46.50% and PPN returned 47.68%. Over the last month GPZ returned 3.13% and PPN returned 3.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GPZ has a size of TRY 7.5B with 289 investors, while PPN has a size of TRY 9.7B with 10,751 investors. PPN leads in size and PPN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPZ is 1 out of 7 and that of PPN is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.