Yatırımcı.AI

FFZ vs IPG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFZ (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FFZIPG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FFZ vs IPG Fund Comparison
MetricFFZIPGCategory median
Daily−0.54%−0.91%−0.33%
1 week−1.31%−0.95%−0.80%
1 month−3.97%0.48%−2.70%
3 months−2.51%4.25%1.63%
6 months−0.35%8.25%4.14%
YTD11.32%16.68%20.92%
1 year20.62%28.59%30.34%
3 years162.17%159.79%165.29%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FFZ vs IPG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFZ (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FFZ leads in 5 and IPG leads in 6. FFZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; IPG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FFZ leads (−0.54% vs −0.91%). 1 week: IPG leads (−0.95% vs −1.31%). 1 month: IPG leads (0.48% vs −3.97%). 3 months: IPG leads (4.25% vs −2.51%). 6 months: IPG leads (8.25% vs −0.35%). YTD: IPG leads (16.68% vs 11.32%). 1 year: IPG leads (28.59% vs 20.62%). 3 years: FFZ leads (162.17% vs 159.79%). Size (TRY): FFZ leads (383.1M vs 351.3M). Investors: FFZ leads (3,870 vs 1,584). Risk: FFZ leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FFZ returned 11.32% and IPG returned 16.68%; over the last year FFZ returned 20.62% and IPG returned 28.59%. Over the last month FFZ returned −3.97% and IPG returned 0.48%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FFZ has a size of TRY 383.1M with 3,870 investors, while IPG has a size of TRY 351.3M with 1,584 investors. FFZ leads in size and FFZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFZ is 4 out of 7 and that of IPG is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.