Yatırımcı.AI

FFZ vs FOA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFZ (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FOA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

FFZFOA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FFZ vs FOA Fund Comparison
MetricFFZFOACategory median
Daily−0.96%−0.52%−0.81%
1 week−1.43%−0.46%−1.35%
1 month−3.14%−0.04%−1.46%
3 months−1.14%6.99%5.43%
6 months11.02%17.75%13.12%
YTD14.25%32.73%21.52%
1 year25.48%43.89%34.01%
3 years182.46%—172.01%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FFZ vs FOA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFZ (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FOA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FFZ leads in 1 and FOA leads in 8. FFZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; FOA is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FOA leads (−0.52% vs −0.96%). 1 week: FOA leads (−0.46% vs −1.43%). 1 month: FOA leads (−0.04% vs −3.14%). 3 months: FOA leads (6.99% vs −1.14%). 6 months: FOA leads (17.75% vs 11.02%). YTD: FOA leads (32.73% vs 14.25%). 1 year: FOA leads (43.89% vs 25.48%). Size (TRY): FFZ leads (443.6M vs 382.8M). Investors: FOA leads (4,282 vs 4,116).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FFZ returned 14.25% and FOA returned 32.73%; over the last year FFZ returned 25.48% and FOA returned 43.89%. Over the last month FFZ returned −3.14% and FOA returned −0.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FFZ has a size of TRY 443.6M with 4,116 investors, while FOA has a size of TRY 382.8M with 4,282 investors. FFZ leads in size and FOA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFZ is 4 out of 7 and that of FOA is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.