Yatırımcı.AI

FFZ vs OLE Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFZ (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and OLE (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FFZOLE
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FFZ vs OLE Fund Comparison
MetricFFZOLECategory median
Daily−0.54%0.10%−0.33%
1 week−1.31%0.71%−0.80%
1 month−3.97%3.02%−2.70%
3 months−2.51%9.97%1.63%
6 months−0.35%21.42%4.14%
YTD11.32%37.06%20.92%
1 year20.62%47.65%30.34%
3 years162.17%255.90%165.29%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FFZ vs OLE Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFZ (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and OLE (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FFZ leads in 1 and OLE leads in 10. FFZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; OLE is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OLE leads (0.10% vs −0.54%). 1 week: OLE leads (0.71% vs −1.31%). 1 month: OLE leads (3.02% vs −3.97%). 3 months: OLE leads (9.97% vs −2.51%). 6 months: OLE leads (21.42% vs −0.35%). YTD: OLE leads (37.06% vs 11.32%). 1 year: OLE leads (47.65% vs 20.62%). 3 years: OLE leads (255.90% vs 162.17%). Size (TRY): OLE leads (409.8M vs 383.1M). Investors: FFZ leads (3,870 vs 434). Risk: OLE leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FFZ returned 11.32% and OLE returned 37.06%; over the last year FFZ returned 20.62% and OLE returned 47.65%. Over the last month FFZ returned −3.97% and OLE returned 3.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FFZ has a size of TRY 383.1M with 3,870 investors, while OLE has a size of TRY 409.8M with 434 investors. OLE leads in size and FFZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFZ is 4 out of 7 and that of OLE is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.