Yatırımcı.AI

FOA vs IPG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FOA (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FOAIPG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FOA vs IPG Fund Comparison
MetricFOAIPGCategory median
Daily0.36%0.18%0.39%
1 week0.50%0.40%0.25%
1 month0.48%0.83%−1.05%
3 months7.55%5.00%6.44%
6 months18.46%11.88%13.81%
YTD33.04%15.54%22.40%
1 year44.65%29.15%35.81%
3 years—160.05%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FOA vs IPG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FOA (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FOA leads in 9 and IPG leads in 1. FOA is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; IPG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FOA leads (0.36% vs 0.18%). 1 week: FOA leads (0.50% vs 0.40%). 1 month: IPG leads (0.83% vs 0.48%). 3 months: FOA leads (7.55% vs 5.00%). 6 months: FOA leads (18.46% vs 11.88%). YTD: FOA leads (33.04% vs 15.54%). 1 year: FOA leads (44.65% vs 29.15%). Size (TRY): FOA leads (380.5M vs 352.5M). Investors: FOA leads (4,273 vs 1,653). Risk: FOA leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FOA returned 33.04% and IPG returned 15.54%; over the last year FOA returned 44.65% and IPG returned 29.15%. Over the last month FOA returned 0.48% and IPG returned 0.83%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FOA has a size of TRY 380.5M with 4,273 investors, while IPG has a size of TRY 352.5M with 1,653 investors. FOA leads in size and FOA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FOA is 4 out of 7 and that of IPG is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.