Yatırımcı.AI

FDV vs ZMT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FDV (Azimut Portföy DMR Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

FDVZMT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FDV vs ZMT Fund Comparison
MetricFDVZMTCategory median
Today (est.)−0.57%—−1.16%
Daily−0.57%−0.01%0.01%
1 week−1.83%0.49%0.30%
1 month−0.31%−0.12%0.00%
3 months2.65%4.19%3.96%
6 months14.97%7.48%8.18%
YTD41.45%13.89%15.73%
1 year50.78%19.18%20.69%
3 years275.72%113.95%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 24, 2026, 12:13.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FDV vs ZMT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FDV (Azimut Portföy DMR Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FDV leads in 4 and ZMT leads in 6. FDV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZMT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZMT leads (−0.01% vs −0.57%). 1 week: ZMT leads (0.49% vs −1.83%). 1 month: ZMT leads (−0.12% vs −0.31%). 3 months: ZMT leads (4.19% vs 2.65%). 6 months: FDV leads (14.97% vs 7.48%). YTD: FDV leads (41.45% vs 13.89%). 1 year: FDV leads (50.78% vs 19.18%). 3 years: FDV leads (275.72% vs 113.95%). Size (TRY): ZMT leads (1.6B vs 1.5B). Investors: ZMT leads (228 vs 1).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FDV returned 41.45% and ZMT returned 13.89%; over the last year FDV returned 50.78% and ZMT returned 19.18%. Over the last month FDV returned −0.31% and ZMT returned −0.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FDV has a size of TRY 1.5B with 1 investors, while ZMT has a size of TRY 1.6B with 228 investors. ZMT leads in size and ZMT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FDV is 4 out of 7 and that of ZMT is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.