Yatırımcı.AI

GZE vs ZMT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZE (Garanti Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

GZEZMT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZE vs ZMT Fund Comparison
MetricGZEZMTCategory median
Daily−0.74%0.10%0.19%
1 week−0.25%−0.40%0.42%
1 month3.19%−1.03%0.94%
3 months21.33%5.21%5.89%
6 months17.60%11.38%12.86%
YTD30.91%13.52%18.07%
1 year52.73%19.50%24.44%
3 years157.83%120.95%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZE vs ZMT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZE (Garanti Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GZE leads in 8 and ZMT leads in 3. GZE is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZMT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZMT leads (0.10% vs −0.74%). 1 week: GZE leads (−0.25% vs −0.40%). 1 month: GZE leads (3.19% vs −1.03%). 3 months: GZE leads (21.33% vs 5.21%). 6 months: GZE leads (17.60% vs 11.38%). YTD: GZE leads (30.91% vs 13.52%). 1 year: GZE leads (52.73% vs 19.50%). 3 years: GZE leads (157.83% vs 120.95%). Size (TRY): ZMT leads (1.7B vs 1.6B). Investors: GZE leads (4,016 vs 261). Risk: ZMT leads (0 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZE returned 30.91% and ZMT returned 13.52%; over the last year GZE returned 52.73% and ZMT returned 19.50%. Over the last month GZE returned 3.19% and ZMT returned −1.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GZE has a size of TRY 1.6B with 4,016 investors, while ZMT has a size of TRY 1.7B with 261 investors. ZMT leads in size and GZE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZE is 6 out of 7 and that of ZMT is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.