Yatırımcı.AI

FDV vs NZT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FDV (Azimut Portföy DMR Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.

FDVNZT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FDV vs NZT Fund Comparison
MetricFDVNZTCategory median
Today (est.)−0.54%—−0.74%
Daily−0.56%0.10%−0.07%
1 week1.96%0.69%−0.29%
1 month−0.06%3.27%0.00%
3 months8.78%9.97%4.33%
6 months22.63%21.06%11.90%
YTD44.58%32.35%14.97%
1 year58.48%45.94%21.27%
3 years266.17%260.48%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 29, 2026, 15:19.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FDV vs NZT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FDV (Azimut Portföy DMR Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FDV leads in 6 and NZT leads in 5. FDV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.10% vs −0.56%). 1 week: FDV leads (1.96% vs 0.69%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.27% vs −0.06%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.97% vs 8.78%). 6 months: FDV leads (22.63% vs 21.06%). YTD: FDV leads (44.58% vs 32.35%). 1 year: FDV leads (58.48% vs 45.94%). 3 years: FDV leads (266.17% vs 260.48%). Size (TRY): FDV leads (1.5B vs 1.4B). Investors: NZT leads (324 vs 1). Risk: NZT leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FDV returned 44.58% and NZT returned 32.35%; over the last year FDV returned 58.48% and NZT returned 45.94%. Over the last month FDV returned −0.06% and NZT returned 3.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FDV has a size of TRY 1.5B with 1 investors, while NZT has a size of TRY 1.4B with 324 investors. FDV leads in size and NZT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FDV is 4 out of 7 and that of NZT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.