Yatırımcı.AI

NZT vs ZMT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

NZTZMT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NZT vs ZMT Fund Comparison
MetricNZTZMTCategory median
Daily0.09%−0.01%0.01%
1 week0.70%0.49%0.30%
1 month3.00%−0.12%0.00%
3 months9.80%4.19%3.96%
6 months21.03%7.48%8.18%
YTD35.53%13.89%15.73%
1 year45.64%19.18%20.69%
3 years259.88%113.95%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NZT vs ZMT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NZT leads in 9 and ZMT leads in 1. NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZMT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.09% vs −0.01%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.70% vs 0.49%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.00% vs −0.12%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.80% vs 4.19%). 6 months: NZT leads (21.03% vs 7.48%). YTD: NZT leads (35.53% vs 13.89%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.64% vs 19.18%). 3 years: NZT leads (259.88% vs 113.95%). Size (TRY): ZMT leads (1.6B vs 1.5B). Investors: NZT leads (289 vs 228).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NZT returned 35.53% and ZMT returned 13.89%; over the last year NZT returned 45.64% and ZMT returned 19.18%. Over the last month NZT returned 3.00% and ZMT returned −0.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, NZT has a size of TRY 1.5B with 289 investors, while ZMT has a size of TRY 1.6B with 228 investors. ZMT leads in size and NZT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NZT is 2 out of 7 and that of ZMT is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.