Yatırımcı.AI

FBV vs FRA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and FRA (Azimut Portföy Mab Serbest Fon) side by side.

FBVFRA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBV vs FRA Fund Comparison
MetricFBVFRACategory median
Today (est.)—0.58%1.06%
Daily0.74%0.04%0.06%
1 week1.78%1.56%0.56%
1 month−6.71%−1.20%1.84%
3 months−8.84%−3.16%3.29%
6 months−7.20%−6.47%7.90%
YTD13.70%8.82%17.53%
1 year18.65%12.70%21.48%
3 years185.90%65.63%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 12, 2026, 12:43.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBV vs FRA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and FRA (Azimut Portföy Mab Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FBV leads in 7 and FRA leads in 3. FBV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FRA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FBV leads (0.74% vs 0.04%). 1 week: FBV leads (1.78% vs 1.56%). 1 month: FRA leads (−1.20% vs −6.71%). 3 months: FRA leads (−3.16% vs −8.84%). 6 months: FRA leads (−6.47% vs −7.20%). YTD: FBV leads (13.70% vs 8.82%). 1 year: FBV leads (18.65% vs 12.70%). 3 years: FBV leads (185.90% vs 65.63%). Size (TRY): FBV leads (530.4M vs 511.8M). Investors: FBV leads (1,526 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBV returned 13.70% and FRA returned 8.82%; over the last year FBV returned 18.65% and FRA returned 12.70%. Over the last month FBV returned −6.71% and FRA returned −1.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, FBV has a size of TRY 530.4M with 1,526 investors, while FRA has a size of TRY 511.8M with 2 investors. FBV leads in size and FBV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBV is 6 out of 7 and that of FRA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.