FBV vs FSG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and FSG (Fiba Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FBV | FSG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | 1.25% | 1.08% |
| Daily | 0.74% | −0.50% | 0.06% |
| 1 week | 1.78% | 1.70% | 0.56% |
| 1 month | −6.71% | −4.36% | 1.84% |
| 3 months | −8.84% | −3.39% | 3.29% |
| 6 months | −7.20% | −10.80% | 7.90% |
| YTD | 13.70% | 12.02% | 17.53% |
| 1 year | 18.65% | 20.42% | 21.48% |
| 3 years | 185.90% | 91.71% | 105.66% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FBV vs FSG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and FSG (Fiba Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FBV leads in 6 and FSG leads in 4. FBV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FSG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FBV leads (0.74% vs −0.50%). 1 week: FBV leads (1.78% vs 1.70%). 1 month: FSG leads (−4.36% vs −6.71%). 3 months: FSG leads (−3.39% vs −8.84%). 6 months: FBV leads (−7.20% vs −10.80%). YTD: FBV leads (13.70% vs 12.02%). 1 year: FSG leads (20.42% vs 18.65%). 3 years: FBV leads (185.90% vs 91.71%). Size (TRY): FSG leads (535.9M vs 530.4M). Investors: FBV leads (1,526 vs 630).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FBV or FSG?
Year to date FBV returned 13.70% and FSG returned 12.02%; over the last year FBV returned 18.65% and FSG returned 20.42%. Over the last month FBV returned −6.71% and FSG returned −4.36%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FBV or FSG?
As of November 12, 2026, FBV has a size of TRY 530.4M with 1,526 investors, while FSG has a size of TRY 535.9M with 630 investors. FSG leads in size and FBV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FBV and FSG mean?
The CMB risk score of FBV is 6 out of 7 and that of FSG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.