Yatırımcı.AI

FBV vs FSG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and FSG (Fiba Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) side by side.

FBVFSG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FBV vs FSG Fund Comparison
MetricFBVFSGCategory median
Today (est.)—−1.77%−1.90%
Daily0.30%0.54%0.19%
1 week−0.23%0.77%0.42%
1 month−3.00%−2.58%0.94%
3 months11.84%−1.14%5.89%
6 months13.46%11.96%12.86%
YTD24.79%19.28%18.07%
1 year29.13%20.95%24.44%
3 years219.67%100.53%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 11:19.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FBV vs FSG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and FSG (Fiba Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FBV leads in 6 and FSG leads in 4. FBV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FSG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FSG leads (0.54% vs 0.30%). 1 week: FSG leads (0.77% vs −0.23%). 1 month: FSG leads (−2.58% vs −3.00%). 3 months: FBV leads (11.84% vs −1.14%). 6 months: FBV leads (13.46% vs 11.96%). YTD: FBV leads (24.79% vs 19.28%). 1 year: FBV leads (29.13% vs 20.95%). 3 years: FBV leads (219.67% vs 100.53%). Size (TRY): FSG leads (629.8M vs 617.4M). Investors: FBV leads (1,739 vs 691).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FBV returned 24.79% and FSG returned 19.28%; over the last year FBV returned 29.13% and FSG returned 20.95%. Over the last month FBV returned −3.00% and FSG returned −2.58%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FBV has a size of TRY 617.4M with 1,739 investors, while FSG has a size of TRY 629.8M with 691 investors. FSG leads in size and FBV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBV is 6 out of 7 and that of FSG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.