Yatırımcı.AI

FBV vs PRU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and PRU (Allbatross Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

FBVPRU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBV vs PRU Fund Comparison
MetricFBVPRUCategory median
Daily0.74%0.11%0.06%
1 week1.78%0.79%0.56%
1 month−6.71%3.60%1.84%
3 months−8.84%11.46%3.29%
6 months−7.20%25.26%7.90%
YTD13.70%47.98%17.53%
1 year18.65%58.45%21.48%
3 years185.90%281.46%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBV vs PRU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and PRU (Allbatross Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FBV leads in 4 and PRU leads in 7. FBV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PRU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi.

Highlights: Daily: FBV leads (0.74% vs 0.11%). 1 week: FBV leads (1.78% vs 0.79%). 1 month: PRU leads (3.60% vs −6.71%). 3 months: PRU leads (11.46% vs −8.84%). 6 months: PRU leads (25.26% vs −7.20%). YTD: PRU leads (47.98% vs 13.70%). 1 year: PRU leads (58.45% vs 18.65%). 3 years: PRU leads (281.46% vs 185.90%). Size (TRY): FBV leads (530.4M vs 525.2M). Investors: FBV leads (1,526 vs 857). Risk: PRU leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBV returned 13.70% and PRU returned 47.98%; over the last year FBV returned 18.65% and PRU returned 58.45%. Over the last month FBV returned −6.71% and PRU returned 3.60%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, FBV has a size of TRY 530.4M with 1,526 investors, while PRU has a size of TRY 525.2M with 857 investors. FBV leads in size and FBV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBV is 6 out of 7 and that of PRU is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.