Yatırımcı.AI

EML vs MHU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

EMLMHU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EML vs MHU Fund Comparison
MetricEMLMHUCategory median
Daily0.77%0.95%0.21%
1 week0.63%1.99%1.17%
1 month2.67%−2.62%−0.49%
3 months−1.03%−2.85%−0.87%
6 months1.79%−3.72%0.68%
YTD25.09%22.99%22.53%
1 year—28.78%29.33%
3 years—155.87%156.25%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EML vs MHU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EML leads in 7 and MHU leads in 2. EML is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MHU is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MHU leads (0.95% vs 0.77%). 1 week: MHU leads (1.99% vs 0.63%). 1 month: EML leads (2.67% vs −2.62%). 3 months: EML leads (−1.03% vs −2.85%). 6 months: EML leads (1.79% vs −3.72%). YTD: EML leads (25.09% vs 22.99%). Size (TRY): EML leads (34M vs 31.9M). Investors: EML leads (785 vs 482). Risk: EML leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EML returned 25.09% and MHU returned 22.99%; over the last year EML returned — and MHU returned 28.78%. Over the last month EML returned 2.67% and MHU returned −2.62%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, EML has a size of TRY 34M with 785 investors, while MHU has a size of TRY 31.9M with 482 investors. EML leads in size and EML leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EML is 4 out of 7 and that of MHU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.