EML vs ICD Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and ICD (TEB Portföy Dördüncü Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EML | ICD | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.45% | 0.09% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −1.48% | 0.74% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −2.63% | 2.89% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −5.42% | 9.44% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 0.09% | 17.14% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 20.25% | 27.64% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | — | 35.66% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | — | 206.99% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EML vs ICD Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and ICD (TEB Portföy Dördüncü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EML leads in 1 and ICD leads in 8. EML is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ICD is a Variable Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ICD leads (0.09% vs −0.45%). 1 week: ICD leads (0.74% vs −1.48%). 1 month: ICD leads (2.89% vs −2.63%). 3 months: ICD leads (9.44% vs −5.42%). 6 months: ICD leads (17.14% vs 0.09%). YTD: ICD leads (27.64% vs 20.25%). Size (TRY): ICD leads (34.5M vs 33.8M). Investors: EML leads (824 vs 184). Risk: ICD leads (2 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EML or ICD?
Year to date EML returned 20.25% and ICD returned 27.64%; over the last year EML returned — and ICD returned 35.66%. Over the last month EML returned −2.63% and ICD returned 2.89%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EML or ICD?
As of October 22, 2026, EML has a size of TRY 33.8M with 824 investors, while ICD has a size of TRY 34.5M with 184 investors. ICD leads in size and EML leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EML and ICD mean?
The CMB risk score of EML is 4 out of 7 and that of ICD is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.