EML vs HKG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and HKG (Ziraat Portföy Halk'ın Üreten Kadınları Değişken Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EML | HKG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −2.56% | −1.89% |
| Daily | 0.01% | 0.50% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.04% | 0.08% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.40% | −4.01% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | −2.63% | 8.16% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 11.44% | 15.63% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 22.54% | 23.81% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | — | 34.27% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | — | −5.19% | 161.05% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EML vs HKG comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and HKG (Ziraat Portföy Halk'ın Üreten Kadınları Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EML leads in 1 and HKG leads in 8. EML is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HKG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: HKG leads (0.50% vs 0.01%). 1 week: HKG leads (0.08% vs −0.04%). 1 month: HKG leads (−4.01% vs −5.40%). 3 months: HKG leads (8.16% vs −2.63%). 6 months: HKG leads (15.63% vs 11.44%). YTD: HKG leads (23.81% vs 22.54%). Size (TRY): HKG leads (39.9M vs 38.9M). Investors: HKG leads (1,105 vs 896). Risk: EML leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EML or HKG?
Year to date EML returned 22.54% and HKG returned 23.81%; over the last year EML returned — and HKG returned 34.27%. Over the last month EML returned −5.40% and HKG returned −4.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EML or HKG?
As of September 28, 2026, EML has a size of TRY 38.9M with 896 investors, while HKG has a size of TRY 39.9M with 1,105 investors. HKG leads in size and HKG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EML and HKG mean?
The CMB risk score of EML is 4 out of 7 and that of HKG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.