Yatırımcı.AI

EML vs HKG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and HKG (Ziraat Portföy Halk'ın Üreten Kadınları Değişken Fon) side by side.

EMLHKG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EML vs HKG Fund Comparison
MetricEMLHKGCategory median
Daily−0.12%−0.55%0.03%
1 week1.32%3.59%0.83%
1 month2.24%−1.59%−1.16%
3 months−1.59%−0.58%−0.11%
6 months0.23%−0.50%0.00%
YTD24.13%22.21%22.14%
1 year—28.80%29.37%
3 years—−5.19%154.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EML vs HKG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EML (Ak Portföy Emlak Sektörü Değişken Fon) and HKG (Ziraat Portföy Halk'ın Üreten Kadınları Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EML leads in 5 and HKG leads in 4. EML is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HKG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EML leads (−0.12% vs −0.55%). 1 week: HKG leads (3.59% vs 1.32%). 1 month: EML leads (2.24% vs −1.59%). 3 months: HKG leads (−0.58% vs −1.59%). 6 months: EML leads (0.23% vs −0.50%). YTD: EML leads (24.13% vs 22.21%). Size (TRY): HKG leads (34.2M vs 33.8M). Investors: HKG leads (1,024 vs 787). Risk: EML leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EML returned 24.13% and HKG returned 22.21%; over the last year EML returned — and HKG returned 28.80%. Over the last month EML returned 2.24% and HKG returned −1.59%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, EML has a size of TRY 33.8M with 787 investors, while HKG has a size of TRY 34.2M with 1,024 investors. HKG leads in size and HKG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EML is 4 out of 7 and that of HKG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.