Yatırımcı.AI

AJP vs MHU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AJP (Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHU (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AJPMHU
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AJP vs MHU Fund Comparison
MetricAJPMHUCategory median
Daily0.68%0.71%0.32%
1 week0.47%0.22%0.42%
1 month−1.87%−2.26%−1.48%
3 months7.34%3.35%4.48%
6 months12.98%14.93%14.82%
YTD29.51%27.99%25.33%
1 year35.40%32.51%35.72%
3 years170.14%172.03%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AJP vs MHU comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AJP (Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHU (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AJP leads in 5 and MHU leads in 5. AJP is a Variable Fund fund managed by Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MHU leads (0.71% vs 0.68%). 1 week: AJP leads (0.47% vs 0.22%). 1 month: AJP leads (−1.87% vs −2.26%). 3 months: AJP leads (7.34% vs 3.35%). 6 months: MHU leads (14.93% vs 12.98%). YTD: AJP leads (29.51% vs 27.99%). 1 year: AJP leads (35.40% vs 32.51%). 3 years: MHU leads (172.03% vs 170.14%). Size (TRY): MHU leads (35.2M vs 33.1M). Investors: MHU leads (515 vs 443).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AJP returned 29.51% and MHU returned 27.99%; over the last year AJP returned 35.40% and MHU returned 32.51%. Over the last month AJP returned −1.87% and MHU returned −2.26%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AJP has a size of TRY 33.1M with 443 investors, while MHU has a size of TRY 35.2M with 515 investors. MHU leads in size and MHU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AJP is 5 out of 7 and that of MHU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.