EDT vs NZT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EDT | NZT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.06% | 0.20% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.62% | 0.47% |
| 1 month | 3.12% | 3.06% | 1.35% |
| 3 months | 9.56% | 9.59% | 3.70% |
| 6 months | 20.72% | 20.66% | 8.84% |
| YTD | 36.68% | 36.83% | 16.33% |
| 1 year | 45.01% | 45.33% | 20.23% |
| 3 years | — | 259.14% | 103.91% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EDT vs NZT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 3, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EDT leads in 5 and NZT leads in 4. EDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EDT leads (0.10% vs 0.06%). 1 week: EDT leads (0.67% vs 0.62%). 1 month: EDT leads (3.12% vs 3.06%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.59% vs 9.56%). 6 months: EDT leads (20.72% vs 20.66%). YTD: NZT leads (36.83% vs 36.68%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.33% vs 45.01%). Size (TRY): NZT leads (958M vs 955.9M). Investors: EDT leads (536 vs 285).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EDT or NZT?
Year to date EDT returned 36.68% and NZT returned 36.83%; over the last year EDT returned 45.01% and NZT returned 45.33%. Over the last month EDT returned 3.12% and NZT returned 3.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EDT or NZT?
As of November 3, 2026, EDT has a size of TRY 955.9M with 536 investors, while NZT has a size of TRY 958M with 285 investors. NZT leads in size and EDT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EDT and NZT mean?
The CMB risk score of EDT is 2 out of 7 and that of NZT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.