BVZ vs EDT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BVZ | EDT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.13% | 0.10% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.72% | 0.67% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 2.89% | 2.92% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.53% | 9.64% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 21.14% | 20.99% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 36.88% | 35.24% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 46.83% | 45.10% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | 286.93% | — | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BVZ vs EDT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BVZ leads in 5 and EDT leads in 4. BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; EDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BVZ leads (0.13% vs 0.10%). 1 week: BVZ leads (0.72% vs 0.67%). 1 month: EDT leads (2.92% vs 2.89%). 3 months: EDT leads (9.64% vs 9.53%). 6 months: BVZ leads (21.14% vs 20.99%). YTD: BVZ leads (36.88% vs 35.24%). 1 year: BVZ leads (46.83% vs 45.10%). Size (TRY): EDT leads (951.5M vs 933.7M). Investors: EDT leads (542 vs 386).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BVZ or EDT?
Year to date BVZ returned 36.88% and EDT returned 35.24%; over the last year BVZ returned 46.83% and EDT returned 45.10%. Over the last month BVZ returned 2.89% and EDT returned 2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BVZ or EDT?
As of October 23, 2026, BVZ has a size of TRY 933.7M with 386 investors, while EDT has a size of TRY 951.5M with 542 investors. EDT leads in size and EDT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BVZ and EDT mean?
The CMB risk score of BVZ is 2 out of 7 and that of EDT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.