Yatırımcı.AI

BVZ vs NZT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.

BVZNZT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVZ vs NZT Fund Comparison
MetricBVZNZTCategory median
Daily0.13%0.09%0.01%
1 week0.72%0.70%0.30%
1 month2.89%3.00%0.00%
3 months9.53%9.80%3.96%
6 months21.14%21.03%8.18%
YTD36.88%35.53%15.73%
1 year46.83%45.64%20.69%
3 years286.93%259.88%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVZ vs NZT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVZ (BV Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BVZ leads in 7 and NZT leads in 3. BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BVZ leads (0.13% vs 0.09%). 1 week: BVZ leads (0.72% vs 0.70%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.00% vs 2.89%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.80% vs 9.53%). 6 months: BVZ leads (21.14% vs 21.03%). YTD: BVZ leads (36.88% vs 35.53%). 1 year: BVZ leads (46.83% vs 45.64%). 3 years: BVZ leads (286.93% vs 259.88%). Size (TRY): NZT leads (1.5B vs 933.7M). Investors: BVZ leads (386 vs 289).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVZ returned 36.88% and NZT returned 35.53%; over the last year BVZ returned 46.83% and NZT returned 45.64%. Over the last month BVZ returned 2.89% and NZT returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, BVZ has a size of TRY 933.7M with 386 investors, while NZT has a size of TRY 1.5B with 289 investors. NZT leads in size and BVZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVZ is 2 out of 7 and that of NZT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.