Yatırımcı.AI

NZT vs ORC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ORC (Astra Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) side by side.

NZTORC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NZT vs ORC Fund Comparison
MetricNZTORCCategory median
Daily0.06%5.16%0.20%
1 week0.62%−3.15%0.47%
1 month3.06%−16.04%1.35%
3 months9.59%−28.26%3.70%
6 months20.66%−27.17%8.84%
YTD36.83%−10.89%16.33%
1 year45.33%−10.45%20.23%
3 years259.14%−35.46%103.91%
Returns are based on prices as of November 3, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NZT vs ORC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ORC (Astra Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 3, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NZT leads in 10 and ORC leads in 1. NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ORC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ORC leads (5.16% vs 0.06%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.62% vs −3.15%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.06% vs −16.04%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.59% vs −28.26%). 6 months: NZT leads (20.66% vs −27.17%). YTD: NZT leads (36.83% vs −10.89%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.33% vs −10.45%). 3 years: NZT leads (259.14% vs −35.46%). Size (TRY): NZT leads (958M vs 957.3M). Investors: NZT leads (285 vs 39). Risk: NZT leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NZT returned 36.83% and ORC returned −10.89%; over the last year NZT returned 45.33% and ORC returned −10.45%. Over the last month NZT returned 3.06% and ORC returned −16.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 3, 2026, NZT has a size of TRY 958M with 285 investors, while ORC has a size of TRY 957.3M with 39 investors. NZT leads in size and NZT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NZT is 2 out of 7 and that of ORC is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.